Published · · Last reviewed · · 6 min read

English · 한국어

How lottery sales are split: Korea and Japan compared

"What share of sales does a Korean lottery pay back?" has a one-number answer. "How does that compare with other countries?" does not, because each country counts its shares differently. Some include tax and commission under "return"; others quote prizes only. This page compares Korea and Japan using sources close to the official, and leaves other countries blank in the table, saying why. Matching definitions first is the heart of the exercise.

First, match the categories

Lottery sales usually divide five ways.

  1. Prizes: the share that returns to players.
  2. Public-purpose allocation: funds or local-government proceeds used for purposes set by law.
  3. Tax (lottery duty or levy): in some countries the state takes a set share of sales directly.
  4. Sales commission: the share paid to retailers.
  5. Operating and promotion costs: issuing, systems, advertising and so on.

Countries merge or split these differently, so placing identically named columns side by side invites mistakes. Korea's "Lottery Fund", for example, means all proceeds left after prizes and distribution costs. Japan's "proceeds" are similar in that they finance public works by the issuing authorities, but whether they are on the same basis needs separate checking.

The two countries we verified

Composition of lottery sales (verified sources only)
ItemKorea: Lotto 6/45Japan: lotteries overall
Prizes50%46.5%
Public-purpose funding43.6% (Lottery Fund)36.2% (proceeds)
Sales commission, operations and similar6.4% (retailer commission 5.4% + other 1.0%)17.4% (costs and commission)
Average return per 1,000 units, before taxKRW 500JPY 465

The Korean figures come from Donghaeng Lottery's Lotto 6/45 page. The Japanese figures are read from the pie chart in a Tokyo Metropolitan Government Bureau of Finance document made in August 2025 ("Do you know how lottery money is used?"). It shows prizes 46.5%, proceeds 36.2% and costs and commission 17.4%, and explains that proceeds are allocated to issuing local governments, Tokyo among them, to fund public works. The same document states that about JPY 60.4 billion of Tokyo public works are planned for fiscal 2025.

That is as far as the table reads. Korea's Lotto has a prize share 3.5 percentage points higher, and Japan's share for sales and operating costs is larger. A buyer gets back KRW 35 more per KRW 1,000 on Korean Lotto. But the table compares different products: the Korean column is one game, the Japanese column appears to be the Tokyo document's average across lotteries, and the document does not state the fiscal year or the coverage, so we mark the Japanese figure partly verified. Prize shares can differ by product.

Why the same ratio can be read differently

Countries we could not verify

These cells are left empty on purpose. We could have filled them with numbers from news or secondary sources, but we hold to the rule of not using values that were not cross-checked against the original.

What comes back for the same spending

Turn the prize-share difference into amounts spent. Units are each country's own currency and are not converted into each other.

Assumption: average return across all buyers on 1,000,000 units spent (before tax)
CountryPrize shareAverage return per 1,000,000 unitsAverage loss
Korea (Lotto 6/45)50%KRW 500,000KRW 500,000
Japan (all lotteries, Tokyo document)46.5%JPY 465,000JPY 535,000

In either country, on average more than half of what is spent does not come back. The 3.5-point gap shows up as an average difference of 35,000 units on 1,000,000 spent, but that average is dominated by a few large wins. Most buyers end up far from the average.

Five checks when reading another country's figures

  1. Scope: one product's structure, or an average over all lotteries?
  2. Date: which year, and has the system been reformed since?
  3. Terms: what do "return", "proceeds" and "fund" include (tax? commission?).
  4. Where the tax is: taken from sales, or from prizes?
  5. Source: an operator or government original, or a secondary summary?

A comparison table that skips these five checks may look tidy and still be wrong. That is why this page leaves the United Kingdom and the United States empty: for them we could not confirm source and terms against the originals.

The claim deadline is part of the structure too

As practical for a buyer as the allocation ratios is the deadline for claiming. The Tokyo document says winning tickets expire after one year and that prizes cannot be collected after that. In Korea the operator's guide gives one year from the start of payment for the round, with expired prizes going to the Lottery Fund, as recorded in this site's tax guide evidence table. The article number of the Korean one-year rule was not confirmed, so it is partly verified. That unclaimed prizes feed public funds is confirmed for Korea; how Japan treats them was not verified here.

Limits and summary

In short, Korean Lotto returns half of sales and collects 43.6% for the Lottery Fund (Where does Korean lottery money go?), while Japanese lotteries, on the Tokyo document, are 46.5% prizes, 36.2% local-government proceeds and 17.4% costs and commission. To compare with another country, first read the original to see which items it counts and how. Formats and odds by country are in the Lottery Explorer.

LottoFlick is independent and not an official lottery operator. Numbers are random and cannot be predicted.

Sources and verification